Saturday, November 8, 2008
It's really interesting for me to hear the response of an artist whose work has so many layers. I often see work [where there seems to be] no link or point. It makes me wonder if there even is a point. i think that sometimes the point is really the artist’s self-expression (the art is about the artist), and not about communication. that kind of work quickly bores me. then there’s art about art, which is often intellectually or conceptually interesting, but sometimes doesn’t have much beyond that. and sometimes the point is so obvious that there isn’t much more to it. and then there is work that is more layered or resonant. Your work is clear that there is a point, it was more an issue of how to interpret it - for me. yes, i do have a point – or rather, points - but the point is not so much a single meaning as it is the activity of interpretation and paying attention to that process. it’s really more about thinking about certain ideas as opposed to “getting” my one specific point.
How do you approach interpreting art? I tend to think that it's important to understand what the artist is trying to communicate so that you can 'hear' what he is saying. well, that is the act of interpretation - "hearing", or rather, listening. gardner has some basic steps for interpretation, which involve working from observation to interpretation. you withhold your opinion until you’ve simply spent time looking at the physical and visual elements of the work and trying to find connections there. we often simply jump right to [our] meaning, and we haven’t really spent time to see what the work is about. in other words, first describe the work: materials, layout, relationships between elements. describe the images, colours, text. think about what they represent symbolically. what are the relationships between those elements? then start to explore whether there are connections or contrasts between those elements and content. that’s where you really start to involve yourself in what the artist is presenting or, more accurately, what the work gives you. after that you can state what you ‘like’ or don’t like, what you think the work is about – but it is then based first on what the artist has done, and then [lastly] what you think. which is, I think, the proper order: work first, viewer/ reader second.
You seem much more flexible in your approach. well -- i do expect the viewer to do the work of looking at the image, interpreting it both culturally and personally, and to find those connections between images and text, between separate elements, and ultimately to themselves and how they see and experience the world. i’d like to think that i’ve given the viewer enough to work with so that they will explore the issues i am interested in. if what you mean by “flexible” is that i give the viewer a lot of power and agency and responsibility to find meaning in the process, then i would agree. if by “flexible” you mean that the viewer can read out of the work whatever they want, i would disagree. i don’t think that option is really available because the work is clearly about specific ideas (which isn’t the same as “points”).
I suppose if the artist has a specific point to communicate, he is responsible to make a clear statement (has he failed then if his work is misinterpreted?), if the artist’s intention is less specific, than the work can be more abstract - more open ended. yes, all aspects of the work (or as much as is possible) should point back to the content. that’s why it’s about more than simply “expression”, or “feelings”. or therapy. This is pretty new to me. People often will misinterpret art regardless, as everyone (or most everyone) sees life through glasses tinted and scratched from their past, so I guess the artist should only be responsible to create the art as true to his vision, and people will see the truth the artist is communicating if they are in a place to accept it. What do you think?
again, i think the artist’s responsibility is to convey their message appropriately. that means they’ve considered: materials, scale, visual elements (such as composition, colour, line), placement of the objects in the space, and the context of the object when it’s released into the world. they should consider their imagery and how it ‘reads’ in their culture and their intended context. if they’ve considered those things, they can be pretty confident that there will be a ‘direction’ to the work, and that the viewer will have a better opportunity to engage with and understand the artist’s intention and the work.
on the other hand, it is the viewer’s responsibility to look at the work and let it reveal what it is about. when looking at the work, you don’t impose your interpretation first – that’s not about the work, that’s about you. the viewer has to take time to look at the work and to let the work “do its thing”. it is crucial that an artist, especially a christian artist, is declaring Truth, and using all the elements to convey the meaning and intent of the work. of course, it does help if the viewer is “in a place to accept” or receive the work. then again, i also think that is more of the emo/ touchy-feely experiential art language that is counter-productive to engaging with the work. looking at art may involve an emotional response (and hopefully it does), but it is more about engaging with ideas, and that means that one can engage with any work regardless. ideally,anyway.
I don't suppose this is what you mean but this one really strikes me as how we have broken down what it means to be human into purely science. The lips - showing love (the kiss)- are dissected into exact dimensions. The fact is that being human is much more than science can show. Infected with love (to actually be human and not wholly empirical), i suppose. nice. i was also referring to words, and language and how they wound us. not just the off-the-cuff remark, but also the carefully measured cruelty of words. it happens at the smallest, most intimate, most basic levels.
"all i have to give you is my weakness"
The human heart shows how fragile we are. The heart contrasted with twine, contrasted with rusted chain, shows that despite the different faces we may put on, it's all weakness - or compromised strength in the case of the chain. It's all we have. [my partner] and I talked about this one a bit. The images of the heart with rope and chain really emphasizes [the] frailness of the heart. and its complexity – “the [human] heart is desperately wicked” is really about our willingness and determination to deceive ourselves and find the ‘easy way’. those chains, connections, knots can be difficult or easy to deal with, but there is a lot to deal with…
"the failure of language"
I can't tell what the drawing is. it’s a bound and suspended rock (or similar object). With that in mind it's hard to relate the comment with the book (a fairly clear symbol of language) and the drawing. I guess the link between the book and the statement must fall in the drawing, but i don't know what it is. there is an implied violence – again referring to how we use words, ideas, knowledge, authority. words (and knowledge) can be contained or released. i may need to clarify the image…
The exhibit as a whole...is powerful. I am impressed. Thanks. I’m glad for your help, but I’m really glad you have engaged so honestly with the work. It was a good exercise to sit down and go through your work like this. I have a short attention span and so I actually got a lot more insight out of your installation by sitting and working through them individually. Is it lame to ask an artist to explain what they intended? I don't know. I don't suppose i should care. I would like to hear your intent. stay tuned -- i will declare my intent.
I may be way off base with this one. It seems like the feet are those of christ on the cross. That with the flames of hell is a tragedy, but it all ends in Joy. nice reading. they could be his feet, but they could also be feet from someone jumping, leaping, diving. they’re active. again, the flames could be passion, or energy, but the consuming aspect is also there to discover. fire consumes. judgement consumes. joy consumes. of course, from an eschatological standpoint, when christ returns, it will be joy. every tear will be wiped away.
"You have lost the power of astonishment at your own actions"
I like the statement. I think the eyes show how what i do is done subconsciously for others. I'll do things to gain approval of others without regard to my morals degrading. The ladder...I don't know. well, there’s the cloud of eyes – we’re being watched (which may or may not elicit a positive response) by a cloud of witnesses, by people, by G-d. the ladder is a little more abstract, but think of it literally: ladders are used to ascend or descend. the question is, what will we do in response to the recognition of the effects of our actions (and words)?
"First, we sing"
I don't get it. songs, expression, creativity, worship – this is where freedom begins. where healing starts. by getting the words out. singing the pain, joy, hope, fear. the hands represent community, healing, worship. the bells are declarations, markers of time, announcing.
"Blesséd is the one whose heart is set on pilgrimage"
The bed-frame reminds me of an old children's movie, I can't remember what its called. It had a bed-frame like this that could fly. The picture is a silhouette of a man on a cliff, but the silhouette being made of birds flying shows the man's heart, or desire for direction and a cause to work toward. it’s also right out of the psalms.
"resistance is a difficult practise"
I looked up "practise" to try and see why you spelled it like this. It's a verb specifically, while practice could be either a verb or a noun. Using that spelling is great. It emphasizes the fact that it's an action. and I do try to be specific in the words we use – thanks for taking the time to look into that. i try to have those deeper layers for those willing to go there. really. words are important. it matters which words we use. I don't know if there is a significance to the object in the picture, but you can see the line between two opposing forces. This with the picture of the man bracing works to illustrate the difficulty of practising resistance. the whole idea of shaping something out of a resistant material (whether stone or man’s heart) is part of it too. the carving is a storm, with waves, and a whirlpool. think jonah. think turmoil.
thanks for the responses. i think there are some very interesting readings here. i will give some of my thoughts about these pieces.
ultimately, the piece is about communication, and how communication is difficult, and how language can be used poorly or cruelly or well.
it’s about how we use knowledge, and how words (and ideas) have power. it’s about what we choose to communicate, or not.
the piece is also really about relationships – between people, between ideas, between words and meaning, etc. the texts also refer to what the artwork (any artwork) actually does - they describe the relational activity that goes on between viewer/ reader and the work in the process of interpretation, as you’re looking and thinking. there are comparisons and equivalencies, but there are also contrasts.
I've been looking at your works, and here are what i get from them:
"you prefer comfort to wholeness"
I really like this one. Me too. People will often avoid issues in their life because of pain that they may need to face to overcome it, even though they would be a more whole person after facing their issue(s). The picture looks like the skeletons are tucked in, trying to feel luxurious with their things, while they are in fact dead. I'm not too sure how the knot fits in, my best guess is that the strength of the knot comes from it's tightness - uncomfortable. very nice reading. the knot also represents connection (an unhealthy one, perhaps?) and to echo the relationship between comfort and wholeness. they look the same, but they’re not.
"make a hole in silence"
I don't get this one. Lions are often associated with royalty, which ties in with the crowns, but from there....these things also represent authority, and therefore the authority to speak into things, to speak into silence, to take control and exercise your power. and words are often the first way people do that. that’s how the prophetic functions, in the sense of brueggemann's "prophetic imagination".
"I remember how it feels to be adored"
Not too sure. I guess drawing from my experience, and relating that to the drawing, I would always feel vulnerable (as the man is naked) as though I want to keep people feeling this way (to gratify my self-worth) but that at any moment they may see the truth of who I am - which relates to the flames; scared that things may get out of control. that being said, the flowers don't seem to fit in with that. there is that, but there is also the idea of longing, of missing the feeling of being adored. passion, love, romance, even desire.
"Why not just say 'lover'"
Another one I appreciate. People won't actually use words to communicate how they feel about others. There is an idea that if I say "I Love You," I give the other person a trump over me. That my frank honesty gives something to others that people can hold against me. Instead I use body language. To communicate what I mean without committing by actually saying what I feel. It's foolish. On a personal note, I've been to a few funerals and it seems so silly for people to get together after someone is dead to say how you really feel about that person. I always wonder at funerals "Did he know you felt that way about him?" There would probably be a lot a value in honestly telling someone what you think of them while they are alive to appreciate it. right. pretty straightforward, i think. once again, it’s about using words, the right words, perhaps even provocative words. again, there’s passion here (that image could be interpreted various ways – it’s from a worship conference brochure, but it looks sensual, or even sexual), but there are also different ways of saying “lover”.
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
these are the 12 images (click on them for details) that were placed inside the lightbox/books. the initial stages involved a combination of collage images and more linear woodcuts as well as drawings. thanks to my wonderful webster's and my etymological dictionaries, as well as the input and contributions of both friends and strangers, i had numerous images and ideas to reflect on as i developed the images. at first i was unsure about including text in the pieces, but as the images developed and began connecting to each other, i decided to complicate some of those relationships by introducing text as simply another way to point the viewer or reader in certain directions.
the texts don't always function the same way -- sometimes they seem to confirm or affirm what's happening in the images, and sometimes they create a dissonance or a friction in the interpretation. and really, that back&forth is an essential part of what i'm interested in as that means that the viewer must make a decision as to how they will 'read' a piece, and then that reading will be complicated when they engage with the next (or another) piece.
Monday, October 13, 2008
i had wanted to turn some books into lightboxes for quite some time (i have 4 or 5 boxes of condensed Reader's Digests, thanks to the local Catholic Church), but had no idea how to go about constructing them. that was the primary challenge since i was absolutely ignorant about the electrical logistics of the planned (hoped for?) piece, and the metaphors of books and light were core to the work. without the lightbox/books, i would have made an entirely different exhibition (though not really - it would still involve the idea of books and explore many of the same ideas). and now i can explore those ideas for other spaces.
in my sketchbooks i collect random [para]phrases and quotes, and recipes for kneeling was one that had been resonating for some time. that phrase became the generating impulse for the exhibition. i knew that i would use books, and i knew that i wanted to use light (and therefore darkness). i knew that i wanted to incorporate an interactive and physical (ritual?) element. the main issue was: how do i build them? the second issue was: what kinds of images do i want to employ (if any)? of course, there were other questions: what media? do i use collage? drawing? painting? should i use text? what size? how many? what arrangement?
to be honest, i tried revisiting previous abandoned images and pieces, but nothing seemed to really suit the piece. while i do tend to work more conceptually (.e. i have an idea and i work towards that idea, considering how the materials 'work' or 'speak', as well as what kinds of images or texts that i want to use) there is also an intuitive component to developing the work and the images/ texts, and the connections between those elements. the first image that seemed to work for the piece was a combination of the following 2 images (which did get used for the piece, albeit in slightly altered form):
these images started generating other related images, and that started the process. in addition, i researched the meaning and history of these two words, and solicited responses from friends, acquaintances and strangers through various forums i haunt. they ended up providing me with an interesting list of options and responses, both specific and general, which also generated images.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
recipes for kneeling
Books have always been the main raw material for my work. Richly metaphorical objects, they symbolize knowledge, story and communication. Books are objects with cultural value, with a human scale and dimension. We all share the experience of holding and even cherishing them.
Light is associated with knowledge, revelation, unveiling. We may seek it, or run from it.
In recipes for kneeling, the symbolic weight of light (as well as its absence) is combined with the metaphorical richness of books. Images and text suggest connections between the books as well as between the books and viewer.
The title for this installation, recipes for kneeling, evokes questions. What is meant by “recipes”? What is meant by “kneeling”? How are they connected, if at all? This questioning is a way to open up ideas for the viewer to explore and to find their own place in the work.
This is a contemplative space. The room is dark and quiet – take time to wait.
i'm not sure what this will be or become, nor how sporadic my activity will be.
i am open to suggestions. that being said, my intentions are various:
~ to post images and examples of my work
~ to enter into discussion and critique about said work
~ to involve people in the process
~ to create opportunities for collaboration
~ to work through ideas and projects through discussion and critique
~ to engage in dialogue about the relationship between the arts and faith
~ to hold forth
and now, onward.